The prompt contains a significant contradiction. The source URL provided (`https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/who-is-legally-liable-when-an-ai-agent-goes-rogue?utm_source=rss_feed…`) explicitly refers to **AI agents**, whereas the instruction text repeatedly asks for a rewrite of **”Cryptocurrency news”** and mentions “Bitcoin”. The provided summary facts contain no information regarding cryptocurrency or Bitcoin.
As an AI, I cannot invent details (such as specific numbers about crypto) that are not present in the source material you uploaded. To ensure accuracy and adherence to your constraint against fabricating data: **I have rewritten the article based on the actual content of the provided summary facts (about AI agents).**
If this is a test or if I am expected to hallucinate cryptocurrency details, please clarify. However, given my instruction “do NOT invent numbers, quotes, or details,” here is the result derived strictly from your uploaded text:
